motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process

(Courtright, 1931) 891033, 891034. 371381. On Day 10, he served and filed an answer that denied all of the material allegations of Sallys complaint and raised the defenses of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and contributory negligence. 173 (D.Mont. 12e.235, Case 1; Bowles v. Jack (D.Minn. 1941) 4 Fed.Rules Serv. That was why the appearance was special. Do the seven defenses involve matters that can be severed for separate determination because they do not go to the merits of the lawsuit? 2. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedurecontains the guidelines forthe motion to dismiss. (1944) 65 S.Ct. See Stevens v. Sec. Sometimes a plaintiff may attempt to serve a defendant with process while also sending the defendant a request for waiver of service; if the defendant executes the waiver of service within the time specified and before being served with process, it should have the longer time to respond afforded by waiving service. In federal proceedings, a motion to dismiss the case is proper when the court lacks subject matter or personal jurisdiction, when venue is improper, when process (the summons) or service of process is insufficient, when the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or when a necessary party has Co. (E.D.Pa. R. Civ. And see Indemnity Ins. (1937) 283. P. 78 (E.D.N.Y. process and failure to state a claim in a single motion, see also Am. No. H2nwc`VH'@ This and other statutes which provide 60 days for the United States or an officer or agency thereof to answer or otherwise defend are continued by this rule. 1939) 27 F.Supp. This amendment affords a specific method of raising the insufficiency of a defense, a matter which has troubled some courts, although attack has been permitted in one way or another. The motions rarely terminate a lawsuit; instead, absent a statute of limitations problem, they merely result in a re-service of process. More Motion to dismiss Ask a lawyer - it's free! But a party may assert the following defenses by motion: (6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and. Please try again. A motion is a request your lawyer files with the court asking for a ruling on a particular matter. Exercise Three explored pleading a complaint. The defense is considered too important to allow it to be waived by mistake. This required consolidation of defenses and objections in a Rule 12 motion is salutary in that it works against piecemeal consideration of a case. P. 15(a)(1)(A) allows the complaint to be amended once as a matter of course before being served with a responsive pleading. While the answer is the responsive pleading to the complaint, no responsive pleading to the answer is usually permitted [unless the court orders a reply pursuant to Fed. Q1(b). The common law provided a plea in abatement to attack jurisdiction and a demurrer to attack the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Defendant appeared in the court for the sole purpose of challenging personal jurisdiction, and no other purpose. For example, if neither party has an issue with venue where the case was filed, the court may still dismiss the case for improper venue. (Doc. R. Civ. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) lists seven defenses that may be raised by the defendant prior to answering the complaint. References in this subdivision to a bill of particulars have been deleted, and the motion provided for is confined to one for a more definite statement, to be obtained only in cases where the movant cannot reasonably be required to frame an answer or other responsive pleading to the pleading in question. R. Civ. By requiring defendant to assert these defenses earlyeither in preliminary motion or no later than the answerthe rules prevent defendant from laying in the weeds and springing such a ground for dismissal on plaintiff later should progress in the litigation not be favorable to defendant. R. Civ. Rule 12(h)(1)(A) provides that a defense of lack of personal jurisdiction is waived by omitting it from a motion in the circumstances described in Rule 12(g)(2). Rule 12(g)(2) provides a party that makes a motion under this rule must not make another motion under this rule raising a defense or objection that was available to the party but omitted from its earlier motion. Since a personal jurisdiction defense was available, and a Rule 12(f) motion is a motion under this rule [Rule 12], the defense of personal jurisdiction was waived. Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors. Failure of defendant to assert one or more of these defenses in one of the preceding manners results in waiver of the defense(s). Under some prior systems of pleading, the defendant was required to raise defenses in sequence, a timeconsuming and inefficient procedure. Subdivision (a). to move for dismissal due to insufficient service of process in civil litigation in United States Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. By amended subdivision (h)(1)(B), the specified defenses, even if not waived by the operation of (A), are waived by the failure to raise them by a motion under Rule 12 or in the responsive pleading or any amendment thereof to which the party is entitled as a matter of course. U.S.C., Title 28, 763 [now 547] (Petition in action against United States; service; appearance by district attorney) provides that the United States as a defendant shall have 60 days within which to answer or otherwise defend. Created byFindLaw's team of legal writers and editors Q1. GAP Report. It was transferred to this District on March 17, 2021. All of the seven grounds for dismissal found in Federal Rule 12(b) are threshold issues that can and should be disposed of before the parties and the court proceed to the work of deciding the merits of the case. 93. On Day 10, George filed a Rule 12(b)(1) motion raising the defense of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Various minor alterations in language have been made to improve the statement of the rule. It's also possible for the court to dismiss a case "sua sponte," meaning without being prompted by either party. See Rule 12(b)(6), permitting a motion to dismiss for failure of the complaint to state a claim on which relief can be granted, is substantially the same as the old demurrer for failure of a pleading to state a cause of action. 643; Teiger v. Stephan Oderwald, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. The next day, George filed a motion under Rule 12(b)(2) to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Co. (C.C.A.8th, 1945) 150 F.(2d) 997, aff'g 62 F.Supp. P. 12(g)(2)]; in the absence of a preliminary motion to dismiss, these defenses must be consolidated into the answer; or these defenses must be consolidated into an amendment to the answer that is allowed to be made as a matter of course. The following are among them: (4) insufficiency of process, (5) insufficiency of service of process. %PDF-1.5 % Has George waived his subject matter jurisdiction defense? Since this exercise concerns waiver of defenses, we will work from back to front in this rule. In a diversity case, the motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction can turn on whether a party acquired citizenship by moving to a new state, a matter that requires a finding of fact about the partys actions and intent. R. Civ. With respect to preparations for trial, the party is properly relegated to the various methods of examination and discovery provided in the rules for that purpose. 1939) 31 F.Supp. Subdivision (b). 1391(a) [venue] and 1404(a) [transfer of venue]. Consequently, a defendant wishing to challenge personal jurisdiction had to be careful; the challenge must have been to personal jurisdiction and nothing else. Subdivision (a) is divided into paragraphs for greater clarity, and paragraph (1)(B) is added to reflect amendments to Rule 4. See also Bowles v. Gabel (W.D.Mo. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). Motion to Dismiss - 2 - 3. With the exceptions of dismissal for failure to join a Rule 19 party and failure to state a claim, all of the grounds for dismissal render the court powerless to act in the case because of a defect in jurisdiction, venue, or service of process. 1941) 36 F.Supp. See Walling v. Alabama Pipe Co. (W.D.Mo. R. Civ. On July 16, 2012, Ms. Tung filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 2-322(a), alleging insufficiency of process and service. Practice Book 10-30(a) (2022). Fed. A 12 (b) (6) motion to dismiss is a useful mechanisms to have a court dismiss a case or at least certain claims pre-trial. On Day 19, prior to his answer, George filed a motion under Rule 12(f) to strike impertinent matter from the complaint. See Benny v. Pipes, 799 F.2d 489, 492 (9th Cir. R. Civ. A party waives any defense listed in Rule 12(b)(2)-(5) by: (ii)include it in a responsive pleading or in an amendment allowed by rule 15(a)(1) as a matter of course. See Commentary, Manner of Raising Objection of Non-Joinder of Indispensable Party (1940) 2 Fed.Rules Serv. (internal citations and quotations omitted), see also Jackson v. Hayakawa, 682 F.2d 1344, 1347 See the Advisory Committee's Note to Rule 19, as amended, especially the third paragraph therein before the caption Subdivision (c).. Compare Rules of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (1937), Equity Rule 11; N.M. Rules of Pleading, Practice and Procedure, 38 N.M.Rep. Note to Subdivision (h). 282 (S.D.N.Y. 1950); Neset v. Christensen, 92 F.Supp. Unless the court sets a different time, serving a motion under this rule alters these periods as follows: (A) if the court denies the motion or postpones its disposition until trial, the responsive pleading must be served within 14 days after notice of the court's action; or. The defense of failure to state a claim has not been waived. Sample demurrer for another action pending in California, California discovery document collection for sale, California unlawful detainer (eviction) document collection for sale, Sample ex parte application for osc for civil contempt in California, Sample motion for vocational evaluation in California divorce, Sample opposition to order to show cause for civil contempt in California, Artificial intelligence - the futuristic world, Meeting 2. Compare the last sentence of [former] Equity Rule 29 (DefensesHow Presented) and N.Y.C.P.A. All 7 sub-sections of 12(b) may be used as grounds for a motion for dismissal. See Dysart v. Remington-Rand, Inc. (D.Conn. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1966 Amendment, Subdivision (b)(7). The court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. The form has no stamp from the court, which I know it should have if she actually filed it. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INADEQUATE SERVICE OF PROCESS . Other states provided that a defendant who proceeded to defend on the merits waived the jurisdictional objection. Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction, Computer-Aided Exercises in Civil Procedure, Next: Exercise Six Joinder and Supplemental Jurisdiction, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Legal Process & Courier Service (1984) 162 Cal.App.3d 1236, 1251. In his answer, George responded to the allegations in Sallys complaint and also raised the defenses of failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, lack of personal jurisdiction, expiration of the statute of limitations, res judicata, and improper venue. 296; Eastman Kodak Co. v. McAuley (S.D.N.Y. Reasons for dismissal vary. Be sure to take your Federal Rules rulebook with you to the computer. The defendant who returns the waiver is given additional time for answer in order to assure that it loses nothing by waiving service of process. . [ii] . Citing Tenn. R. Civ. No. 1946); Elbinger v. Precision Metal Workers Corp., 18 F.R.D. A motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process is properly brought to challenge the method of serving the process. 1941) 42 F.Supp. That defense, however, does not require or allow the court to look beyond the face of the complaint, and hence is a good defense to sever and consider early. On the other hand, the clause might be read as adding nothing of substance to the preceding words; in that event it appeared that a defense was not waived by reason of being omitted from the motion and might be set up in the answer. Rule 12(h)(1)(B) provides that the venue defense is waived if it is omitted from a Rule 12 motion, or no motion having been made, if it is omitted from a responsive pleading or in an amendment allowed by Rule 15(a)(1) as a matter of course. Here the amendment is permitted as a matter of course because no responsive pleading is normally permitted to an answer [see Fed. 17, 2000, eff. 0 B. %PDF-1.6 % If the United States provides representation, the need for an extended answer period is the same as in actions against the United States, a United States agency, or a United States officer sued in an official capacity. If the case is in federal court, you can check the federal rules of civil or criminal procedure to learn more. [Former] Equity Rule 29 (DefensesHow Presented) abolished demurrers and provided that defenses in point of law arising on the face of the bill should be made by motion to dismiss or in the answer, with further provision that every such point of law going to the whole or material part of the cause or causes stated might be called up and disposed of before final hearing at the discretion of the court. Likewise many state practices have abolished the demurrer, or retain it only to attack substantial and not formal defects. 26, 2009, eff. (Deering, 1937) 433; 4 Nev.Comp.Laws (Hillyer, 1929) 8600. 1. P. 7(a)] and more than 20 days have passed since service of the answer [see Fed. With the exception of dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, all of the grounds for dismissal are separable from the merits. As previously mentioned, the procedure for filing a motion to dismiss will depend on the jurisdiction in which the lawsuit is filed. The addition at the end of subdivision (b) makes it clear that on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) extraneous material may not be considered if the court excludes it, but that if the court does not exclude such material the motion shall be treated as a motion for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56. Enjoy access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, and more from Scribd. The motion to dismiss must be filed with the court and served on the other party. The following pagesand the accompanying computer-aided exercise CALI CIV 09contain several questions to probe your understanding of the interrelationships of the federal rules and federal statutes involved in questions of waiver of defenses under Federal Rule 12. Has George waived the venue defense? 1940) 34 F.Supp. P. 12(h)(2) provides that the defenses of failure to state a claim [Fed. For example, the defense of insufficient process can involve the mere assertion that plaintiff omitted the summons or the complaint from otherwise proper processa matter that cannot have much importance to a defendant who obviously knows of the lawsuit or she would not be making the motion. Second, Fed. On Day 4, prior to his answer, George filed a motion under Rule 12(b)(2) to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Federal legal newsletter by visiting the following link: most courts . den. The next day, George filed a motion under Rule 12(b)(3) to dismiss for improper venue. 4. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. (C.C.A.8th, 1940) 108 F.(2d) 302; Rossiter v. Vogel (C.C.A.2d, 1943) 134 F.(2d) 908, compare s. c. (C.C.A.2d, 1945) 148 F.(2d) 292; Karl Kiefer Machine Co. v. United States Bottlers Machinery Co. (C.C.A.7th, 1940) 113 F.(2d) 356; Chicago Metallic Mfg. For example: If you are suing someone in small claims court over a civil case, every state has different rules about how that complaint is to be presented to the other party. On Day 15, George filed an answer responding to the allegations in Sallys complaint and raising the defense of improper venue. Yes. Will this amendment save the personal jurisdiction defense? Samara v. United States (C.C.A.2d, 1942) 129 F.(2d) 594, cert. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". On Day 4, prior to his answer, George filed a motion under Rule 12(b)(1) to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. P. 12(b)(3)], insufficient process [Fed. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. So, you may wonder, do you have another option? We've updated our privacy policy. Later amendment of the answer, as by consent of the parties or by leave of court, does not save the omitted defense. 20-21.) 1939) 28 F.Supp. 1976). Sample motion for substitution of plaintiff in United States District Court. Activate your 30 day free trialto unlock unlimited reading. It does not store any personal data. Changes Made After Publication and Comment. ), Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1937. (ii) if it has timely waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent, or within 90 days after it was sent to the defendant outside any judicial district of the United States. On Day 45, George filed his answer, which was timely because the Rule 12(b)(1) motion extended the time for filing the answer until 10 days after notice of the courts action on the motion. No postage, she must have dropped them off. motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure sold by the author (f) Motion to Strike. Q10. The plaintiff, for example, can raise the defenses in response to a counterclaim. R. Civ. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his initial Complaint in the Eastern District of Arkansas on February 2, 2021. When these cases have reached circuit courts of appeals in situations where the extraneous material so received shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material question of fact and that on the undisputed facts as disclosed by the affidavits or depositions, one party or the other is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the circuit courts, properly enough, have been reluctant to dispose of the case merely on the face of the pleading, and in the interest of prompt disposition of the action have made a final disposition of it. On the other hand, many courts have in effect read these words out of the rule. EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit. Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. P. 12 (a) (4) (A). Yes. P. 12(a)(1)(A(ii)]. P. 12(g)(1). A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a responsive pleading is allowed. 30, 2007, eff. R. Civ. At that point, defendant might have a choice to make. 6e` 0 B The sole purpose of allowing such motions seems to be to encourage parties to mind their formalities. Subdivision (g) has forbidden a defendant who makes a preanswer motion under this rule from making a further motion presenting any defense or objection which was available to him at the time he made the first motion and which he could have included, but did not in fact include therein. Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court. They can subscribe to the author's weekly California and No changes are recommended for Rule 12 as published. :&}Dhhnq+@# 10t|OY3}PBpU\2(f3qZ$JdSoCu~fEq(NF#p{mYRf(>6*_4. A party who by motion invites the court to pass upon a threshold defense should bring forward all the specified defenses he then has and thus allow the court to do a reasonably complete job. 1940); cf. I can advise you this service - www.HelpWriting.net Bought essay here. The motion must be made before filing a responsive pleading and must point out the defects complained of and the details desired. Co. (S.D.N.Y. Under Rule 12(h)(1), the defense of insufficiency of service is waived if omitted from a motion Compare [former] Equity Rule 33 (Testing Sufficiency of Defense); N.Y.R.C.P. Due process prohibits a Defendant from . Pac. R. Civ. In other words, these two rule 12 defenses are not waived by failure to consolidate them into a preliminary motion. This is done when the defendant believes a claim in the lawsuit is legally invalid, or there are legitimate grounds for throwing the case out of court. Note to Subdivisions (b) and (d). NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14, 06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief, Mandamus actions in immigration avoiding dismissal and proving the case. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. Answer the question, then scroll down to compare your answer to the authors answer. Sally filed a complaint against George and process was served on Day 1. 1470, No. No. 2000). (1935) 9107, 9158; N.Y.C.P.A. The failure to do so can have a negative impact on your case. This is a Court Sample and NOT a blank form. . (1930) 378, 379. We've encountered a problem, please try again. We determined that Stursberg had not properly served Defendants . This section contains questions for you to answer to test and strengthen your knowledge of waiver of Rule 12 defenses. (1943) 317 U.S. 695. United-States-District-Court (1937) 278 and 279; Wash.Gen.Rules of the Superior Courts, 1 Wash.Rev.Stat.Ann. hkO0?n/qGBZJit$xm4?.I All rights reserved. Thus if the defendant moves before answer to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, he is barred from making a further motion presenting the defense of improper venue, if that defense was available to him when he made his original motion. (h) Waiving and Preserving Certain Defenses. R. Civ. 440; United States v. Turner Milk Co. (N.D.Ill. Option two is to raise any and all of these defenses in a preliminary motion, one made before the answer is pleaded. They are presented for illustration purposes only. The Rule 26(c) motion for a protective order was not a Rule 12 motion, so omission of a venue defense did not trigger the waiver provisions of Rule 12(h)(1). For exceptions to the requirement of consolidation, see the last clause of subdivision (g), referring to new subdivision (h)(2). 40. P. 12(h)(3) provides that the defense of lack of subject matter jurisdiction [Fed. On the other hand, in many cases the district courts have permitted the introduction of such material. R. Civ. Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states in pertinent part that, A party may (i) Hearing Before Trial. Nat'l Bank, 538 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir. No. Q1(a). In both systems, the defendant could make a special appearance to challenge jurisdiction. 2. Due process is not met where a Defendant is unable to read, speak or comprehend the language in which notice to the Defendant is provided. The change here was made necessary because of the addition of defense (7) in subdivision (b). Has George waived the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction? If a defendant fails to do The defense of personal jurisdiction was waived by failure to join it in the Rule 12 motion. hb```f``Rg`202 P ]}S284h4-bO`Jec 'urO*30=5Y4]\S=Ib@ G6ta !aiU `&]j!$hpf. R. Civ. R. Civ. Looks like youve clipped this slide to already. Without filing any preliminary motions, George filed an answer on Day 10 in which, in addition to responding to allegations in Sallys complaint, he raised the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, improper venue, and expiration of the statute of limitations. 1944) 8 Fed.Rules Serv. filed under the circumstances described in Rule 12(g)(2). hbbd```b``:"A$Cd ! To serve the United States, a party must serve: (1) the U.S. Attorney's Office by Carter v. American Bus Lines, Inc., 22 F.R.D. R. Civ. The court has this option when grounds for a case dismissal exist. The reason the rules limit defendant to one preliminary motion is rather obvious. Mere "conclusory allegations of law and unwarranted inferences are insufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss." Adams v. . A Motion to Quash Service of Summons challenges Plaintiff's improper Service of Summons and Complaint. Pretrial motions can resolve many important questions about your lawsuit. 1958). Nos. P. 15(a)(1)(B) gives defendant 20 days after serving the answer on the plaintiff to amend the answer as a matter of course. While you can fight the court case, it will take a considerable amount of your time and money to do so. This rule continues U.S.C., Title 28, 80 [now 1359, 1447, 1919] (Dismissal or remand) (of action over which district court lacks jurisdiction), while U.S.C., Title 28, 399 [now 1653] (Amendments to show diverse citizenship) is continued by Rule 15. No. Co. v. Edward Katzinger Co. (C.C.A.7th, 1941) 123 F.(2d) 518; Louisiana Farmers Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc. (C.C.A.8th, 1942) 131 F.(2d) 419; Publicity Bldg. Others, like those chal-lenging personal jurisdiction, service of process, or venue, may result only in the plaintiff bring-ing suit again in another forum. Slusher v. Jones (E.D.Ky. The judge will then review each side's motion, and give the court's decision at a predetermined hearing date. Contact a qualified attorney to help you with preparing for and dealing with going to court. The amendments are technical. . Brockmeyer v. May, 383 F.3d 798, 801 (9th Cir. Co. v. Mylish (E.D.Pa. State v. Salters, 137 N.C. App. If the motion to dismiss is denied, the defendant must still file their answer, usually within a shortened amount of time. 147). | Last updated May 11, 2018. Some of the defenses are trivial, and some are highly important. The sentence appended to subdivision (c) performs the same function and is grounded on the same reasons as the corresponding sentence added in subdivision (b). The Committee believes that such practice, however, should be tied to the summary judgment rule. For the purpose of this section none of the following constitutes a general appearance in the action: (a) A stipulation pursuant to Section 583.230 extending the time within which service must be made. A defendant wishing to raise any one of these seven challenges has two options. See 6 Tenn.Code Ann. . 12b.33, Case 2, 5 F.R.D. If the defendant is not named in the Complaint under either a true or fictitious name, the . (7) failure to join a party under Rule 19. P 8(c)(1)] could not have been raised in the Rule 12 motion, and therefore cannot be waived by omission from the motion. Subdivision (f). (1937) Rules 106112; English Rules Under the Judicature Act (The Annual Practice, 1937) O. Federal Rule 12(b) has abolished the special appearance: No defense or objection is waived by joining it with one or more other defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or in a motion.. I. R. Civ. Q2. The questions in the written exercise and the computer-assisted lesson examine these rules and statutes, consider the reasons for special treatment of Rule 12 defenses, and analyze the waiver provisions of the rule. Rule 12(h)(1)(A) provides for waiver of a venue defense omitted from a Rule 12 motion in circumstances in which Rule 12 requires joinder. This type of motion may focus on the facts and allegations in the complaint and any documents - called "exhibits" - that are submitted in support of the complaint. Yes. [See Exercise Two, part I.A]. (b) A motion to dismiss made pursuant to this chapter, whether joined with a motion to quash service or a motion to set aside a default judgment . P. 12(b)(6) provides that a party may assert a defense by motion for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted." 2 Defendants mistakenly refer to Fed. The other party then has the opportunity to respond to the motion, usually within a couple of weeks. 96 0 obj <>stream Mar. Service is timely waived if the waiver is returned within the time specified in the request (30 days after the request was mailed, or 60 days if mailed out of the country) and before being formally served with process. Exercise Four - Demurrers and Judgments on the Pleadings, 5. 18). We do not explore the requirements of, or drafting, an answer, which is the responsive pleading to the complaint. unidentified bodies in tucson az, why does my bird bite me for no reason,

What Does Wydb Mean In Texting, Touro College Pa Program, Articles M